I am interested in how progenitors of reasonable ways to actualized reciprocity beyond the ritualism of biologically evolved reciprocal altruism are treated in public discourse and theories of such. How have such ideas become unutterable in dominated public discourse? What are the semiotics of such taboos?
The truth is that some people are afraid of losing access to their addictions. They don't want their whores empowered by a wider horizon of choices.
Page 81 of this Gbook explains why I need people calling me, although sometimes work is stimulated by simulation of others' individual needs or consideration of ones status.
No comments:
Post a Comment